Where do you see 30? When i look at their site it mentions 20? It's on a 5300,- laptop and at 29.97fps for 1 minute. And, having that unified control interface for all of them is just the bees knees. But, those slices will be played on little computers in-sync for multiscreen TV walls, rather than being played out of Resolume. The M1 Max will be useful for creating and rendering out large compositions (23,040 x 2160, for example) and rendering out 3840x2160 slices. I don't need a big beefy computer anymore for playback. You should either find a workaround or some other piece of software that can do what you want." "One Tip: In general when someone sais you should 'wait' for the issue number to pop up in the release notes, you shouldn't actually wait for us until we've solved it. I basically just obeyed what Menno, one of the Resolume developers, told users to do here: And, the software provides a unified interface for all of them. I, too, am curious how the M1 Max performs in Resolume as well, but as stated previously, I am using different software now for this, that uses many many little computers for multi-screen outputs, rather than one big beefy computer for that. Seems consistent with the performance loss associated with using Rosetta 2. In Resolume, on an M1 (original), I can play (3) 3840x2160p30 clips layered, without dropping frames. In Final Cut Pro, on an M1 (original), I can play (4) 3840x2160p30 clips layered, without dropping frames. I wanted to take a moment and answer your question, Arvol.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |